26 Apr (Revision of ASME STS-1–). Steel Stacks. AN AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD. Three Park Avenue • New York, NY • USA. In addition, the materials of construction referenced in this Standard may not be allowed for use with flammable gases under pressure per ASME B and. ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of this interpretation when or if additional REC# STS (81KB) · STS Section ( 9KB).
|Published (Last):||1 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||10.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Can anyone comment in agreement or disagreement with the above methodology? I meant to asme sts 1 2006 or add, that in your second para. The change in economic conditions is making this type of request much more common.
They don’t have your head scratcher, because they don’t worry about, asmr design from the standpoint of, thin shell elastic buckling. Typically this condition occurs when we have a relative thick shell, and asme sts 1 2006 my conclusion was that it behaves more as a “Beam” and we can ignore local buckling concerns of a thin wall shell.
Or, as paddington suggested any discussions of the standards in journals, prior to adoption.
Can a stack containing thicknesses that do not comply with eq. I could take about months to get an official response. We should maybe looking at another form of buckling for these kinds of cylindrical structures, and that is that ets can go into a flatter, or oval, shape.
Terio, i asme sts 1 2006 had that thought It seems this was a not seeing the forest bc of the trees issue.
He’s probably the most knowledgable guy with regard to stack asme sts 1 2006. Y becomes 1 as noted in case 4. But, that normally has more to do with a working stress level, dia. Must go, but perhaps this will spark your thoughts. Again, does this thought and design process, when 11 is not satisfied, coincide with the intended design of the ASME? You say your own calcs.
Committee Pages – STS Steel Stacks
But, I doubt that wts the same one you are looking at, which I understand you see in Gaylord’s book. A more interesting question now may be to read some of the literature on vibration and dynamics of stacks.
What do you do when Eq is not satisfied If the answer to the above is yes, what design method is acceptable. Handbook that asme sts 1 2006 cited, and I see asmr I’ve actually used that in design, about 25 years ago. I just don’t see that thickening the pl.
It is purely D to t. You might look back at an earlier edition and see if you aren’t dealing with a misprint here. I still think this would be a real interesting question to ask ASME.
AISC doesn’t comment on non-compact sections in their table B5. I am not familiar with this standard but the way I read section 4. Sorry for the confusion dhengr, see attached xsme of the asme-sts1.
Download Now Over the past three decades, 3D printing has developed a reputation as an essential manufacturing process for prototype parts. And, I suspect wts your FY should really be F gamma. Gaylord’s Eqs return similar results In hindsight The only thing i can possibly asms of is that the rolling of thicker plate to smaller diameters could compromise the steel??? Digital transformation may be the most frequently misunderstood and misused term in business discourse today.
By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. It certainly isn’t a rolling issue in the 1.
As far as it being asme sts 1 2006 misprint, i have, and an earlier version at my office and they all state the same exact formula. As an example, a This makes no sense to me.
Resources Digital transformation may be the most frequently misunderstood and misused term in asme sts 1 2006 discourse today. Solving for Sbl in the asme allowable combined long.
Your allowable stress to prevent buckling will be less than. Artificial intelligence AI has recently become a field in which research is proceeding at a feverish pace. Yes, my wording was poor in regards to table C Dhengr, im still looking for some of your other references and the number of my coworkers asme sts 1 2006 are puzzled or interested by this is growing daily Notice the reference and similarities to the ASME. A lot of variance in opinion.