RFC CAPWAP Protocol Base MIB May CAPWAP Control Channel: A bi-directional flow defined by the AC IP Address, WTP IP Address, AC control. The Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol is a standard, The protocol specification is described in RFC RFC (part 1 of 6): Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points ( CAPWAP) Protocol Specification.

Author: JoJoshakar Goltijas
Country: Japan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 3 August 2014
Pages: 318
PDF File Size: 13.83 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.93 Mb
ISBN: 766-3-55770-808-3
Downloads: 39224
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Bajin

More specifically, it fails to define key duties mentioned in [Section 2.

This reduces complexity of the AP. Ideally controllers of any vendor could provision access points from any other vendor, cappwap they implement a common CAPWAP protocol. In either case, the L2 wireless management frames are processed locally. This limits interoperability to only vendors who have implemented [RFC]which is just Cisco as of the time of this writing.

CAPWAP – Wikipedia

The significant cost of enterprise level WLAN capwa, coupled with both hardware and software differences on Controllers and Access Points breeds vendor lock-in.

The implementation described in [Bernaschi09] is not ready for currently available APs.

The status of interoperability between vendors currently was discussed, as well as the plans of each vendor to support CAPWAP in the future. The second program is run on each AP, in order to facilitate communication between the AP and controller.

Meru has made no plans public for enabling support for a standards compliant method of AP-controller interaction. Table cwpwap Contents 1.

The state machine in [fig6] show the 4 states attainable during protocol negotiation by a device. Third, monitoring the status of both hardware and software configurations is necessary to ensure a properly operating network. Overall convergence for the APs to come online will take longer in this scenario. One of the reasons for such little support is that the deployment is restricted to a Layer 2 boundary. Securing – This phase establishes an encrypted tunnel, over which a protocol can capqap agreed upon.


This lack of customer mobility leads to less innovative product offerings from the wireless vendors. A standard that ensures compatibility between vendors is necessary to prevent vendor lock-in. Additionally, because of its generic design, the network location of an AP and controller do not necessarily have to be within the same broadcast domain. The proposal cites the fapwap of IPsec for general data traffic, and does not provide any mechanism of encrypting data messages between the controller and AP, only control messages, and the key exchange process between both devices.

However, the process is slow, as upgrade paths are not necessarily direct and simple. Thus, the entire process of deploying an AP can be implemented in a vendor neutral format, from finding an initial controller, to deploying firmware updates, to configuration and access point redirection.

Current Status and Overview of the CAPWAP Protocol

Many vendors use this to their advantage, and create product differentiation by including features into their wireless products, such as firewall capability in their controller hardware. Because SLAPP supports both layer 2 and 3, access points may be in completely different routed networks as the controller, rvc even across the Internet. There are 2 primary components to the wireless network.

Without obtaining an adequate license from the person s controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other capwa; English. It is important to realize that the definition of what a controller is is not clearly defined.

Converting Protected Data into Unprotected Data. Fit APs still rely on the controller for configuration and some frame processing. There is no back haul required for Fat APs, because it can put packets and frames directly on the wire, in contrast to Thin AP implementations.


Overview of CAPWAP (Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers)

Some vendors have produced products that allow operation with multiple brands of AP, such as Aruba Network’s AirWave being able to provision and control Aruba, Cisco, and Meru access points. Change State Event Request Local MAC capsap to the location of the The network entity that provides WTP access to the network infrastructure in the data plane, control plane, management plane, or a combination therein.

A single Receiver thread receives and processes any requests from APs. SLAPP was designed as a simple, extensible protocol that could be acpwap to other wireless standards, and allow for newer authentication schemes and control protocols to be implemented on top of SLAPP.

The migration towards a unified standard will be long, and not necessarily even happen, because each vendor already supports its own proprietary protocols, and sees little motivation to commoditize their AP hardware by introducing CAPWAP across the industry. Discovery – New APs must seek out a controller with which to associate. The only vendor that has produced a CAPWAP implementation thus far is Cisco, but it relies on some proprietary protocols, thus limiting compatibility.

Current Status and Overview of the CAPWAP Protocol

Split and Local MAC medium access control. In some vendor’s access points, even wireless encryption is not even performed at the AP. More consideration has been placed on ensuring that CAPWAP is secure, by taking advantage of the security offered by requiring full encryption with authentication between the controller and AP.

The challenges facing wireless networks with regard to standardized management and provisioning are difficult.