DoDAF has been designed to meet the specific business and operational needs of . These Views are supported by DoDAF , and should be consulted for. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. The DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version facilitates the ability of Department of Defense (DoD) managers at all levels to make key decisions more .
|Published (Last):||28 January 2006|
|PDF File Size:||12.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Information about how aspects of the enterprise are connected e. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. The approach to the presentation of Architectural Description moves away from static and rigid one-size-fits-all templates of architecture portrayals for architects.
In turn, DoD Instruction In most cases, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content. The term integrated means that data required in more than one instance in architectural views is commonly understood across those views.
For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules dodaaf criteria that govern the architecture.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or 22.0 architectures. It defines a way of representing an enterprise architecture that enables stakeholders to focus on specific areas of interests in the enterprise, while retaining sight of the big picture.
Alignment with the reference models ensures that important elements of the FEA are described in a common and consistent way. For more information or a quote please contact sales nomagic.
DoDAF Conformance ensures reuse docaf information and that architecture artifacts, models, and viewpoints can be shared with common understanding. Many times, these design products were not understandable or useful to their intended audience. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
It xodaf the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. DoDAF does not prescribe any particular Views, but instead concentrates on data as the necessary ingredient for architecture development.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
Teams will find it easier to take the abstract and make it meaningful, and achieve net-centric results. DoD managers, as process owners, specify the requirements and control the development of architectures within their areas of authority and responsibility.
These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that architectures will explain current and future states of the process or activity under review.
Skip to main content Press Enter. Organized collections of views often representing processes, systems, services, standards, etc. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. In April the Version 1. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. It also provides extensive guidance on the development of architectures supporting the adoption and execution of Net-centric services within the Department.
Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. The Project Viewpoint also details dependencies doodaf capability and operational requirements, system engineering processes, systems design, and services design within the Defense Acquisition System process. The viewpoints categorize the models as follows:. Overview Product Offerings Professional Services. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the dodf and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.
Government and Defense – UPDM, DoDAF , MODAF, and NAF
It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means dpdaf process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter. Compliance with the EAAF ensures that enterprise architectures are advanced and appropriately developed to improve the performance of information resource management and IT investment decision making.
In addition, a note on system engineering is included. Models can be documents, spreadsheets, dashboards, or other graphical representations and serve as a template for organizing and displaying data in a more easily understood format. Broad summary information about the whole enterprise e.
Government and Defense
The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.
This page was last edited on 3 October doxaf, at These products are dodad under four views:. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. However, when the basic structure of an activity is very stable and the activity repeated often, such as military dodwf planning or project definition and management, the enterprise may choose to include that structure as part of the Architectural Description itself.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. However, it should be emphasized that DoDAF is fundamentally about creating a coherent model of the enterprise to enable effective decision-making. The Systems Viewpoint accommodates the legacy system descriptions.
Calls for the development of Enterprise Architecture to aid in enhancing the management and promotion of electronic government services and processes. Each viewpoint has a particular purpose, and usually presents one or combinations of the following:.